[coyotos-dev] Binary naming

[Christopher Nelson]

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 10:51 -0400, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:45 -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > > It isn't clear that any equivalent to the process status command should
> > > even *exist* in Coyotos. One user has no intrinsic right to examine the
> > > processes of another, or even to examine the process substructure of
> > > their own applications!
> > 
> > What about management applications?  Presumably there will need to be a
> > way to view all processes executing in order to drop runaway processes,
> > or perhaps to do some accounting.
> 
> Why? If the goal is to do resource management and accounting, then what
> you want to look at is the resource consumption pools. It is none of
> your business how many, or how few, processes a given application
> internally constructs out of its storage.
> 
> They aren't your processes.

I am thinking in the vein of enterprise management software.  I can see
that we probably have terminology mismatch.

I presume that there is a way to get all running applications on the
system? And also some way to account for their resource usage?

-={C}=-