[coyotos-dev] Binary naming
devbox at selnet.org
Thu Apr 10 16:52:34 CDT 2008
On 10/04/2008, at 15.45, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 21:27 +0200, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
>> A small set of tools might want to read the process name (process
>> various system monitors).
>No. First, there is no amount of storage that we can put into the
>process state that solves this problem. Second, it is up to the process
>to disclose (or fail to disclose) its name.
I don't understand the first, can you expand?
A process that discloses info can be monitored.
>This is a bring-up convenience only.
>It isn't clear that any equivalent to the process status command should
>even *exist* in Coyotos. One user has no intrinsic right to examine the
>processes of another, or even to examine the process substructure of
>their own applications!
Isn't it necesssary for debuggin programs?
>coyotos-dev mailing list
>coyotos-dev at smtp.coyotos.org
More information about the coyotos-dev