[coyotos-dev] Impact of checkpointing on mobile systems

Pierre THIERRY nowhere.man at levallois.eu.org
Sat Jul 7 12:00:18 EDT 2007


Scribit Jonathan S. Shapiro dies 07/07/2007 hora 11:40:
> The concern is that the checkpoint subsystem is a part of the security
> foundation. Introducing configurability here is potentially very
> dangerous to the entire system.

I see.

> In general, I am not in favor of configurability. There is a
> difference between "options" (e.g. what paper size do I want) and
> "configurability" (e.g. what *policy* do I want). Configurability
> usually indicates a design error in the system.

I'm a bit surprised, because in this respect, it seems Coyotos will be
far more configurable than most of the current systems. I take it as a
great virtue.

Doubtfully,
Pierre
-- 
nowhere.man at levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/coyotos-dev/attachments/20070707/de61c7f9/attachment.bin 


More information about the coyotos-dev mailing list