[coyotos-dev] Opinion wanted on ccs-xenv

[Valerio Bellizzomi]

On 18/01/2007, at 17.29, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:

>Most of you probably never see the ccs-xenv tree, but I'ld like a sense
>of preferences on this.
>
>The gcc binary tarballs are huge, and I'm sure that this makes
>downloading and updating a pain in the neck. Speaking for myself, I
>would prefer to store them in unpacked form.
>
>The problem is that we need to make sure they do not change, and running
>
>	./configure;make distclean
>
>in the gcc tree does NOT return the tree to an unmodified state. I only
>figured out today how to work around this.
>
>So: would people prefer to see these unpacked, or should they stay as
>they are?

I prefer unpacked if it makes the update easier. I'm going to wait for the
flex problem to go away before building a new development machine.


val