[coyotos-dev] Update to bitc spec

[Pierre THIERRY]

Scribit Jonathan S. Shapiro dies 01/09/2006 hora 17:11:
> I believe that you are reading this backwards.

In some way. I did not pay attention enough, and associated code with
the preceding notation instead of the one following it.

I think the current layout is somewhat uncommon. It looks like some
definition list, with the terms followed by their code, whereas it is
the contrary.

May I suggest one of the following:

  +------------------+
  | (code1)          |
  +------------------+
			notation1

  +------------------+
  | (code2)          |
  +------------------+
			notation2

or

notation1
	+------------------+
	| (code1)          |
	+------------------+

notation2
	+------------------+
	| (code2)          |
	+------------------+

I think the easiest to read and the most natural is the second, but that
depends on what you want to derive from what...

Clearly,
Nowhere man
-- 
nowhere.man at levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/coyotos-dev/attachments/20060902/aa623317/attachment.bin