[coyotos-dev] Accept GCJ into the tool chain?
starfirex at comcast.net
Mon Nov 27 20:15:00 CST 2006
On Nov 27, 2006, at 8:43 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 14:45 -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
>> Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>>> In short, gcc/g++ win against Haskell on both memory consumption and
>> I would rather have slightly slower code that works than no code
>> at all
>> or incorrect code.
> I tend to agree, but "slightly slower" should certainly mean "within a
> factor of two". Even on these fairly contrived benchmarks, we aren't
> seeing a factor of two in far too many of the cases.
> It will be very interesting to see how BitC does when it stabilizes.
Indeed it shall. A lot of it may depend on compiler optimization
though, but even that depends heavily on the language (for example
one which uses heavy assembly or direct-to-assembly syntax would be
far less affected by a compiler).
> coyotos-dev mailing list
> coyotos-dev at smtp.coyotos.org
More information about the coyotos-dev