<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">>Violent arguments?<br><br>Does this mean we have to write two Matrix classes now, one based on the exact number class and another on the inexact class? <br><br><br>--- On <b>Tue, 3/10/09, Jonathan S. Shapiro <i><shap@eros-os.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap@eros-os.com><br>Subject: [bitc-dev] Overloading arithmetic<br>To: bitc-dev@bitc-lang.org<br>Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:08 AM<br><br><div id="yiv1460111458"><p>An obvious example of an incorrect OpenMP program has just convinced me that FP arith ops should not share operators with integer arith ops: FP ops are not associative, which interacts with optimizability.</p>
<p>Violent arguments?</p>
<p>shap, from my phone</p>
</div><br>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br><div class="plainMail">_______________________________________________<br>bitc-dev mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:bitc-dev@coyotos.org" href="/mc/compose?to=bitc-dev@coyotos.org">bitc-dev@coyotos.org</a><br><a href="http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev" target="_blank">http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>