[bitc-dev] Current thoughts on mixfix

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Stuart Cook <scook0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> If a naked {} block doesn't have the obvious/traditional meaning then
> I assume that you'll issue a very stern compiler warning (error?) upon
> finding one.


I'm not sure what obvious/traditional meaning you expect, and I can't think
of any case where this proposal would create a problem with an empty block.

Can you give an example?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/attachments/20100903/dae83c84/attachment.html