[bitc-dev] How complete is BitCC?

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

I have just added the surface syntax and OO issues to the ToDo list
(they'll show up in about ten minutes). With those two issues added, I
think the ToDo list is fairly sensible. Oh. There is also an
outstanding issue about separate compilation, but that's definitely
not something to deal with in the short term.

My highest priority is to get surface syntax nailed down, because
nearly all of the rest is stuff that can come online incrementally.

shap

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Samium Gromoff
<_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru> wrote:
> Generally speaking, how complete is BitCC?
>
> More specifically, how accurately does the set of missing features mentioned
> in the todo list[1] represent delta from the spec[2]?
>
> Sorry if this was already answered, a cursory look at the list archive
> didn't reveal much..
>
>
> --
> 1. http://bitc-lang.org/browse/compiler/ToDo.html
> 2. http://bitc-lang.org/docs/bitc/spec.pdf
>
> regards,
>  Samium Gromoff
> --
> "Actually I made up the term 'object-oriented', and I can tell you I
> did not have C++ in mind." - Alan Kay (OOPSLA 1997 Keynote)
> _______________________________________________
> bitc-dev mailing list
> bitc-dev at coyotos.org
> http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
>
>