[bitc-dev] Random thoughts on mixfix

Kevin Reid kpreid at mac.com
Thu Mar 18 04:06:52 PDT 2010

On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:15, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:

> where the semantic actions of mixsequence simply build a  
> concatenated list of the constituent mixfix keywords, identifiers,  
> and literals. We then run ResolveMixFixSequence on this list as a  
> post-pass, which converts the initially parsed sequential AST into  
> the expression AST intended by the prevailing mixfix syntax rules.

I believe this is a sometimes-used strategy to parse Haskell infix  
operators. (There are no variable-precedence prefix or postfix  

Kevin Reid                                  <http://switchb.org/kpreid/>

More information about the bitc-dev mailing list