[bitc-dev] C--- and LLVM

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

If that is the case, then why would one consider using C--?

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Sandro Magi <naasking at higherlogics.com>wrote:

> My mistake. They're planning to move away from the gcc backend, and I
> thought I had read C-- would eventually go away given it's not really
> being actively developed anymore, but I can't seem to find where I got
> that idea. I'd wager their C-- support will depend on how well LLVM
> adapts to support their needs in the near future, since maintaining
> native backends is a lot of work.
>
> Sandro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/attachments/20100311/964d40ca/attachment.html