[bitc-dev] C--- and LLVM
Jonathan S. Shapiro
shap at eros-os.org
Thu Mar 11 07:13:49 PST 2010
If that is the case, then why would one consider using C--?
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Sandro Magi <naasking at higherlogics.com>wrote:
> My mistake. They're planning to move away from the gcc backend, and I
> thought I had read C-- would eventually go away given it's not really
> being actively developed anymore, but I can't seem to find where I got
> that idea. I'd wager their C-- support will depend on how well LLVM
> adapts to support their needs in the near future, since maintaining
> native backends is a lot of work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bitc-dev