[bitc-dev] Reviewing the state of BitC

[Sandro Magi]

Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> Why?
>
> And what do you mean by "compiling to assembler"? I suppose that's
> compiling to x86, and there's lots of systems that are not x86, in the
> embedded world there even are a lot of architectures in use not targeted
> by gcc.
> C is today's (only) portable assembler.

Not really. LLVM and C-- are both "portable assembly languages" of sorts.

Sandro