[bitc-dev] Arity: middle position?

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:20 PM, William Leslie <
william.leslie.ttg at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12 August 2010 15:22, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.org> wrote:
> > Does this smell like it might work? If so, then the whole thing becomes
> > purely a matter of surface syntax.
>
> Sure. Can I still specify a concrete calling convention for a
> parameter or field? Do I need to specify the calling convention of
> exported functions? If not, what is the default?
>

I don't understand the question. The calling convention is defined by the
underlying platform. The proposed rule is that given a chain of arrows, the
right-most thing is the return value. If the return value is a function, it
must be parenthesized.

shap
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/attachments/20100812/5f8a4d0c/attachment.html