[bitc-dev] Are type classes just abstract, generic classes?
raould at gmail.com
Thu Apr 1 10:34:46 PDT 2010
> for me, the most fundamental risky disconnect is static ascii code you
> can read vs. actual dynamic runtime behaviour of that code :-}
anyway, the underlying point i have is that just because things are
already complicated and possibly confusing, that doesn't sound like a
good argument to heap on more possibly confusing things. of course, it
is presumed that is just the price of advancing flexibility.
More information about the bitc-dev