[bitc-dev] Overloading arithmetic

[Gelf Mrogen]

>Violent arguments?

Does this mean we have to write two Matrix classes now, one based on the exact number class and another on the inexact class?   


--- On Tue, 3/10/09, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote:

From: Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com>
Subject: [bitc-dev] Overloading arithmetic
To: bitc-dev at bitc-lang.org
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 1:08 AM

An obvious example of an incorrect OpenMP program has just convinced me that FP arith ops should not share operators with integer arith ops: FP ops are not associative, which interacts with optimizability.
Violent arguments?
shap, from my phone

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
bitc-dev at coyotos.org
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/attachments/20090309/bc54196b/attachment-0003.html