[bitc-dev] Syntax Poll: Scoping Syntax

Pal-Kristian Engstad pal_engstad at naughtydog.com
Thu Mar 5 15:58:24 EST 2009

Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Pal-Kristian Engstad
> <pal_engstad at naughtydog.com> wrote:
>> I think I am arguing for curly-braces. Curly-braces represent scope (and
>> groups) very naturally, is easy on the eyes for C programmers and is perhaps
>> easier to parse.
> Parsing (actually, lexing) "{" and "}" is not harder than parsing "in"
> and "end".
Sorry, I should have said easier to parse for humans. :-)


Pål-Kristian Engstad (engstad at naughtydog.com), 
Lead Graphics & Engine Programmer,
Naughty Dog, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd, 6000 North,
Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA. Ph.: (310) 633-9112.

"Emacs would be a far better OS if it was shipped with 
 a halfway-decent text editor." -- Slashdot, Dec 13. 2005.

More information about the bitc-dev mailing list