[bitc-dev] Pools in lieu of GC

[Rick R]

Is there a more formal (but not too formal) location to store these
conversations?
Perhaps a BEP wiki in which people can post future proposals (Bitc
Enhancement Proposals, per se)

Mail archives are fun and all, but imo they're only made slightly useful
because google indexes them so well.

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com>wrote:

> Just to be clear, there are two separate discussions that we need to have:
>
> 1. What place-holders (if any) do we need to have *syntactically* if
> we decide that we want to support explicit pools?
> 2. How do pools (if we build them) actually work?
>
> shap
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Raoul Duke <raould at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I propose that we hold on the placed allocation question until the
> >> syntax question stabilizes a little, so that we can have it once
> >> instead of multiple times.
> >
> > i'm very much looking forward to learning from that future discussion!
> > it should be an interesting and fun topic.
> >
> > sincerely.
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitc-dev mailing list
> > bitc-dev at coyotos.org
> > http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> bitc-dev mailing list
> bitc-dev at coyotos.org
> http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
>



-- 
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them.
   - A. Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.coyotos.org/pipermail/bitc-dev/attachments/20090305/55610d6b/attachment.html