[bitc-dev] Syntax Poll: Polymorphic Types

Jonathan S. Shapiro shap at eros-os.com
Thu Mar 5 13:29:59 EST 2009


On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Zorg 421 <zorglub421 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Personnaly I would let the caml like syntax, for not having to switch
> between two habits for languages I do not use on a day to day basis.

I agree that would have been nice, but the OCaml let syntax is fatal,
and the fact that BitC doesn't curry imposes some changes. I do think
that we can stay within the "feel" of OCaml, though.


More information about the bitc-dev mailing list