[bitc-dev] Syntax Poll: Polymorphic Types
Raoul Duke
raould at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 13:14:28 EST 2009
> It's subjectively more readable:
>
> char list vs. list [of] char.
if the "of" was not optional, then i'd be all for it. seriously. i
think it was AsML from MSR that had very "english" syntax and it was a
small change that at first seemed stupid, but quickly felt very
comfortable much better than reading equivalent C#. as small a
cognitive load as it might be, it is some, and removing it was
actually noticeable. crazy.
sincerely.
More information about the bitc-dev
mailing list