[bitc-dev] Surface Syntax (again)

[Mark Miller]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote:
> 2. I'm increasingly convinced (however reluctantly) that mixfix is important
> in a non-sexpr surface syntax.

I hate mixfix too. Since your conclusion is already reluctant, perhaps
if you posted your rationale we could talk you out of it.

-- 
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

    Cheers,
    --MarkM