[bitc-dev] Surface Syntax (again)
erights at gmail.com
Wed Feb 25 14:39:02 EST 2009
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote:
> 2. I'm increasingly convinced (however reluctantly) that mixfix is important
> in a non-sexpr surface syntax.
I hate mixfix too. Since your conclusion is already reluctant, perhaps
if you posted your rationale we could talk you out of it.
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
More information about the bitc-dev