[bitc-dev] Revisiting stack-ref

[Swaroop Sridhar]

Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>   1. Captured by-reference arguments might be considered legal if
>      the closure is non-escaping.
> 
>        Swaroop: What is the status of our closure escape analysis?
>        At this point I don't even know if we are *doing* closure
>        escape analysis.

By closure-escape analysis, I think you are referring to the closures 
that capture some non-local, non-global variables which are themselves 
returned or captured (as opposed to the captured variables of the 
closure), right? We are not currently doing this analysis.

Swaroop.