[bitc-dev] Newline conventions
Dominique Quatravaux
dom at kilimandjaro.dyndns.org
Sun Feb 19 14:24:20 EST 2006
Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>
>>Maybe you could use a dual-syntax
>>system along those lines, e.g. \uFFFF and \u{FFFFF...FFF}?
>>
>>
>
>Yuck!
>
>Principle: one bad syntax is better than two.
>
>
For once, I have to respectfully disagree. If there is one team that put
some thoughts into getting the source code easy to write (though, I
concede, not necessarily easy to read :-), it is the Perl folks. I do
code in Perl a lot, and the literal-Unicode convention is good enough
for me: simple things simple, complex things possible. And "there is
more than one way / syntax to do it" is a *good* thing, even
(especially!) if neither way is satisfactory in and of itself.
--
<< Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les jardiniers >>
Dominique Quatravaux <dom at kilimandjaro.dyndns.org>
More information about the bitc-dev
mailing list