[bitc-dev] Re: [eros-arch] Typo in example in the BitC spec

Jonathan S. Shapiro shap at eros-os.org
Sat Jan 22 17:08:47 EST 2005


Thanks for the correction!

Just FYI, mail concerning bitc should go to bitc-dev at coyotos.org Please
feel free to join that list, as well as coyotos-dev at coyotos.org


shap

On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 13:04 -0800, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> About a third of the way down, you give an example of a
> mutually-recursive function definition.  It defines ``odd'' twice, but
> it's pretty clear that the second function should have been named
> ``even''.
> 
> http://coyotos.org/docs/bitc-spec/bitc-spec.html



More information about the bitc-dev mailing list