[bitc-dev] A thought about TUPLE

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

I just noticed that because of BitC's implicit tuplization, the keyword
"tuple" actually doesn't need to be a keyword at all for purposes of
expressions:

	(define tuple (lamda x x))

causes

	(tuple a)

to do the right thing. The only reason that we need TUPLE to be a
keyword is because it also has a role in types and pattern matching.

Amusing.

shap